Skip to main content
Connecticut Lemon Law

Lemon Law Attorneys in Connecticut

At RockPoint Law, lemon law is our core practice. We act for Connecticut drivers whose new vehicle keeps going back for the same fault, whether that's a stall on I-95 at Bridgeport or a drivetrain warning that comes back every time the car comes off the lift in Waterbury.

Free Case Evaluation

Three quick questions. No cost, no obligation.

  1. The year and make of your vehicle
  2. What the dealer has already tried
  3. How to reach you, and we review it
Start My Free Case Review  Call (516) 550-3323

Sending this does not create an attorney-client relationship. A case evaluation is a first step, not legal representation.

In Connecticut, the claim goes to an arbitrator the Department of Consumer Protection appoints. The Department collects the evidence and provides the arbitrator with an independent ASE-certified mechanic for consultation. The remedy is a replacement or a refund. A repeat repair isn't on the list.

  • All 169 Connecticut towns
  • 2 years or 24,000 miles to report the fault
  • No fee unless we recover
Key facts

Connecticut lemon law at a glance

The numbers a Connecticut claim runs into, from the first question (is this vehicle covered?) to the last (how long to challenge the award?), each with the section it comes from.

Key facts of the Connecticut New Automobile Warranties statute, Conn. Gen. Stat. sections 42-179 to 42-190
Key figureWhat it meansWhere it comes from
3 classesof vehicleA passenger motor vehicle (up to ten passengers including the driver), a passenger and commercial motor vehicle, or a motorcycle, sold or leased in Connecticut. No weight limit.Sec. 42-179(a)(2); sec. 14-1
2 yearsor 24,000 milesReport the fault within two years of original delivery or the first 24,000 miles, whichever ends first. Repairs can come later.Sec. 42-179(b)
1 attemptor a refusalNo claim on any route unless at least one repair attempt was made, or the manufacturer, its agent or a dealer refused to try.Sec. 42-179(e)(3)
4 repairssame faultThe same nonconformity repaired four or more times inside the period, and it continues to exist.Sec. 42-179(e)(1)(A)
2 repairssafety fault, 1-year clockA fault likely to cause death or serious bodily injury, repaired at least twice, inside the warranty term or one year from delivery, whichever ends first.Sec. 42-179(f)
30 dayscalendar, cumulativeOut of service for repair a cumulative thirty or more calendar days inside the period. The thirtieth day is enough.Sec. 42-179(e)(1)(B)
60 daysto a decisionThe state arbitrator decides within sixty days of your filing, after the Department gathers the evidence and an ASE-certified expert reviews it.Sec. 42-181(d)
120,000offset divisorThe use deduction: contract price times the miles driven up to the manufacturer's acceptance of the return, divided by 120,000.Sec. 42-179(d)(3)
30 daysto challenge an awardNo motion to vacate, modify or correct an award after thirty days from notice of it. This deadline sits outside the Lemon Law.Sec. 52-420(b)
The Short Answer

What is the lemon law in Connecticut?

Yes, Connecticut has a lemon law, and it dates from 1982. If you bought or leased a new vehicle in Connecticut and a fault that substantially impairs its use, safety or value is still there after four repair attempts, or after thirty calendar days out of service, the manufacturer has to replace it or refund what you paid. A fault likely to cause death or serious injury needs only two attempts, on a shorter clock. The claim goes to an arbitrator appointed by the Department of Consumer Protection, and the department builds the case file itself.

The statute is chapter 743b of the General Statutes, sections 42-179 to 42-190. Public Act 82-287 created it in 1982. The state-run arbitration program came two years later, in Public Act 84-338, and section 42-181(b) applies it to vehicles bought on or after 1 October 1984. Two acts, two years apart, and worth keeping separate.

Report it inside two years or 24,000 miles

Section 42-179(b) asks you to report the fault within two years of original delivery or the first 24,000 miles of operation, whichever ends first. For the repair duty, only the report has to land inside that window. The same subsection makes the manufacturer do the repairs “notwithstanding the fact that such repairs are made after the expiration of the applicable period.” The presumptions in section 42-179(e) are stricter: the repairs, or the days out of service, have to happen inside the window too. So the dates to keep are:

  • the second anniversary of original delivery, and the day the odometer reaches 24,000, for the four-repair and thirty-day routes;
  • the first anniversary of delivery, or the end of the express warranty if that comes sooner, for the two-repair safety route;
  • and, once an award arrives, thirty days from notice of it, if either side wants to challenge it.

Three routes, one floor underneath them

The ordinary route under section 42-179(e)(1) is the same fault repaired four or more times and still there, or the vehicle out of service a cumulative thirty or more calendar days. The third route needs a careful read. Section 42-179(f) says that where the fault “results in a condition which is likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle is driven”, two repairs are enough, but only within “the express warranty term or ... one year following the date of the original delivery, whichever period ends first.” Fewer repairs, and less time. Section 42-179(e)(3) then bars every claim “unless at least one attempt to repair a nonconformity has been made”, or the manufacturer, its agent or a dealer refused to attempt one. A refusal isn't a dead end. It's a way in.

Notice depends on your owner's manual

Section 42-179(c) says no consumer shall be required to notify the manufacturer of a claim unless the manufacturer has clearly and conspicuously disclosed, in the warranty or the owner's manual, that written notification is required before you can get a refund or replacement. If it does require notice, the same subsection makes it give you the name and address to send it to. So read your manual first. Connecticut makes the manufacturer decide this in advance, in writing.

Which forum hears the claim turns on one fact Connecticut doesn't publish. Section 42-181(b) opens the Department's arbitration if the manufacturer has not established an informal dispute settlement procedure certified by the Attorney General. Section 42-182 gives the Attorney General that job, with an annual report, certificates of approval, subpoena power, public hearings and the power to suspend or revoke. There's no published list of certified manufacturers, so this is a question to ask at the start.

Two more Connecticut statutes sit behind this one. Chapter 743f puts a dealer warranty on most used cars sold here, and chapter 743g makes a manufacturer tell you about any warranty adjustment program covering your vehicle, hand over the service bulletin on request, write to every eligible owner within ninety days of adopting one, and reimburse anyone who paid for a covered repair before learning about it.

Eligibility

What qualifies for the lemon law in Connecticut?

The fault first. Section 42-179(d)(1) reaches a defect or condition that substantially impairs the use, safety or value of the vehicle to the consumer, and Connecticut's courts read that as both a subjective and an objective test. What the car is worth to you is part of the question.

Then the count. Section 42-179(e) sets the four-repair and thirty-day routes, section 42-179(f) adds the safety route on its own shorter clock, and the fourth card covers the two questions that come before any counting: the one-attempt floor, and which forum you're in. Each card includes a Connecticut example and a self-check.

Four Repairs of the Same Fault

The same nonconformity goes back four or more times and is still there. Section 42-179(e)(1)(A) runs this on the full period, two years from original delivery or the first 24,000 miles, whichever ends first, and asks that the fault “continues to exist.” A fault cured on the fourth visit doesn't meet it.

A Connecticut example A new SUV back at a Danbury dealer four times for the same transmission shudder, still shuddering at 19,000 miles

Two Repairs on a Safety Fault, Inside One Year

Section 42-179(f) presumes a reasonable number of attempts where the fault “results in a condition which is likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle is driven” and has been “subject to repair at least twice.” The rest of that sentence matters as much. The route is confined to “the express warranty term or ... one year following the date of the original delivery, whichever period ends first.” Two repairs instead of four, on a one-year clock instead of two years and 24,000 miles.

A Connecticut example Brakes that have twice failed to hold on a hill, written up both times inside the first eleven months, and still not right

Thirty Calendar Days Out of Service

Section 42-179(e)(1)(B) qualifies a vehicle out of service for repair a cumulative thirty or more calendar days inside the two-year, 24,000-mile period. They're calendar days, so a weekend at the dealership counts. The wording is “thirty or more”, so the thirtieth day is enough. Section 42-179(e)(2) adds back time when war, invasion, strike, fire, flood or other natural disaster made repair services unavailable.

A Connecticut example A pickup that sits at a New Britain service department across three visits for the same fault and reaches a cumulative total of thirty calendar days, with the first visit documented

At Least One Attempt, and the Right Forum

Two questions come before the counting. Section 42-179(e)(3) bars any claim unless at least one repair attempt was made, or the manufacturer, its agent or an authorized dealer refused to attempt one. Then the forum: section 42-181(b) opens the Department of Consumer Protection's arbitration only if your manufacturer has no procedure certified by the Attorney General. If it has one, section 42-179(j) sends you through that procedure first. If that panel didn't follow section 42-182(b) and 16 C.F.R. Part 703, section 42-181(h) lets you ask a state arbitrator to hear it de novo.

A Connecticut example A letter from the manufacturer insisting on its own program, and a claim that turns out to be eligible for the state forum because no certification was ever in place

Invoices on request, and the defenses to plan for

Meeting a test starts the analysis. Section 42-179(d)(4) gives the manufacturer two defenses: the fault doesn't substantially impair use, safety or value, or it came from abuse, neglect or unauthorized modifications or alterations by a consumer. Note the last two words. A modification the dealer made isn't a defense.

Keep every repair order and invoice with the drop-off and collection dates, the purchase or lease agreement, and the odometer reading at each visit. Section 42-179a makes a dealer or a manufacturer's authorized agent hand over copies of any paperwork or invoices about repair work on request, and refusing is an infraction. Write the mileage down every time: Connecticut's use deduction keeps counting until the manufacturer takes the car back.

Not sure which of the three routes your repair history clears? Send it over and we'll read it for you.

Start My Free Case Review  Call (516) 550-3323
Where your case is heard

Where is a Connecticut lemon law claim heard?

Connecticut drivers usually ask whether a claim means a trip to Hartford. Mostly it doesn't. The claim starts as a filing with a state department, the department does much of the work, and the hearing comes last.

A State Department Builds the File

Section 42-181(a) makes the Department of Consumer Protection provide the arbitration. The Commissioner appoints the arbitrator, who must belong to an arbitration organization and may not work for or contract with any business that makes, distributes, sells or services motor vehicles. Under section 42-181(d) the Department “shall investigate, gather and organize all information necessary for a fair and timely decision”, and the Commissioner may issue subpoenas for the arbitrator.

An Independent Mechanic Advises the Arbitrator

Section 42-181(d) sends all written testimony and documentary evidence to “an independent technical expert certified by the National Institute of Automotive Service Excellence”, or someone with equivalent credentials, “who shall review such material and be available to advise and consult with the arbitrator.” The person deciding whether your car is a lemon has a qualified technician to ask, supplied by the state and independent of the manufacturer.

Sixty Days, and No Repair Order

The arbitrator has sixty days from your filing to decide, and a late decision is still valid. Liability turns “solely on whether the manufacturer has failed to comply with section 42-179.” The remedies are a replacement acceptable to you, the full contract price with collateral charges, reimbursement and incidental damages, and anything available under Magnuson-Moss, “other than repair of the vehicle.” A manufacturer's own panel can tell you to try another repair. The state arbitrator can't.

The Superior Court, and Thirty Days to Get There

The award is “final and binding as to the rights of the parties ... subject only to judicial review.” Either side may apply to the Superior Court for the judicial district where one of them lives. Questions of law are reviewed de novo; on the facts the court “shall uphold the award unless” the findings lack substantial evidence and a party's substantial rights were prejudiced. Section 52-420(b) bars a motion to vacate, modify or correct “after thirty days from the notice of the award.”

Whose program you're in depends on a certificate

A manufacturer may write telling you to use its own dispute program first. That's correct only if the Attorney General has certified the program under section 42-182. If it hasn't, section 42-181(b) puts you in the state program. Connecticut publishes no list of certified programs, so we establish the answer at the start rather than take the letter's word for it.

If the manufacturer ignores the award

Section 42-181(e) makes every extra day of willful non-compliance a separate violation for purposes of section 42-184, and lets the Department fine the manufacturer up to $1,000 a day until it performs. If it appeals “without good cause”, the court may award you costs and fees. Section 42-181(f) also sends the Department's compliance statistics to the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, where they're “considered a factor in determining the issuance of any manufacturer license.”

The filing itself: fees, screening, and deciding it on the documents

Section 42-181(b) sets the consumer's fee at $50 and the manufacturer's at $250, and gives the manufacturer fifteen days to file its form. Those figures come from the statute's text. The Department doesn't currently restate them on its live Lemon Law pages, so check the current form before relying on the amount. Section 42-185 says no filing fee is waived, refunded, reduced or withheld except as the chapter provides or by court order on proof of economic hardship.

If the Department rejects a complaint at initial review, you can take that rejection to an arbitrator for a final decision on a written request and a further $50. By written agreement signed after the case starts, it can be decided on the documents with no hearing. And if you sell the car while the claim runs, section 42-181(c) says the buyer must hear about the pending case before signing the bill of sale, and the Department must hear about the sale within five days.

The program keeps score, and the score is a public record

Section 42-181(f) makes the Department keep records of every dispute, including an index by brand name and model, and compile statistics each year on manufacturer compliance with arbitration decisions and on the refunds and replacements awarded. The summary is a public record, so the forum's track record can be checked.

The notice on the showroom wall

Where a manufacturer has no Attorney General certification, section 42-181(g) requires notice of the Department's dispute procedure to be prominently posted at each new car dealer selling that manufacturer's vehicles, and displaying it is a condition of the dealer's license. There may be one on the wall where you bought the car.

There's no deadline to request arbitration. Section 42-181 sets none, and neither do the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies. Waiting still costs money, because the use deduction counts miles until the manufacturer accepts the return.

Not sure whether your manufacturer holds an Attorney General certification, or which forum that puts you in? We work that out first, at no cost.

  • Bring your repair invoices with the dates and odometer readings. That's usually enough to see whether your record clears the four-repair, thirty-day or two-repair safety route.
  • Bring your owner's manual. Section 42-179(c) requires written notice only if the manual or warranty says so.
  • If the fault is a safety fault, check the date. The two-repair route closes at one year or the end of the warranty, whichever comes first.
  • You speak with the people who would work the file, not an intake desk.
Start My Free Case Review 
A Connecticut driver on the phone at home while a Department of Consumer Protection lemon law arbitration request is prepared and filed for them
You Stay Put

Most of a Connecticut claim happens on paper

People hear “arbitration” and picture a day in Hartford. The request goes in on the Department's own form with the filing fee, the Department screens it, then gathers and organizes the evidence itself and sends it to the ASE-certified expert who advises the arbitrator. If both sides agree in writing after the request is made, the case can be decided on the documents alone.

We establish whether your manufacturer holds an Attorney General certification, read your owner's manual for any notice requirement, collect the invoices section 42-179a entitles you to, count the calendar days, work out which route your record clears, run the section 42-179(d)(3) offset, and deal with the manufacturer. Your part is the phone call that starts it.

How It Works

How long does a Connecticut lemon law case take?

There's no deadline to file, but once you do, the statute runs on a short clock. The manufacturer has fifteen days to answer, the arbitrator has sixty days from your filing to decide, and section 52-420(b) gives thirty days from notice of the award to challenge it. Counted from the day your request is filed, those limits look like this. The five steps below follow the order a Connecticut claim actually runs.

  1. Day 0Your request goes to the Department of Consumer Protection with the filing fee
  2. Day 15Latest day for the manufacturer to file its own form and fee, under section 42-181(b)
  3. Day 60Latest day for the arbitrator's decision, under section 42-181(d). A late decision is still valid
  4. Day 90Latest day to move to vacate, modify or correct the award when notice of it arrives on Day 60, under section 52-420(b)

Check the Vehicle, the Clock and Your Owner's Manual

Section 42-179(a)(2) reaches a passenger motor vehicle, a passenger and commercial motor vehicle or a motorcycle as section 14-1 defines them, sold or leased in Connecticut. The only size test is section 14-1(74)'s ten passengers including the driver, with no weight limit and no business-use exclusion. Then section 42-179(b): the fault has to have been reported inside two years or 24,000 miles. And read your manual, because section 42-179(c) requires written notice only if the manufacturer disclosed that requirement there or in the warranty.

Collect the Invoices, Using Section 42-179a if You Have To

Connecticut has no routine safety inspection for ordinary cars, so there's no yearly state record of your vehicle's condition. Your repair paperwork is the evidence. Section 42-179a makes a dealer or a manufacturer's authorized agent give you copies of any paperwork or invoices about repair work on request, and a refusal is an infraction. Check that each invoice names the fault the same way, note the drop-off and collection date on each, and record the odometer at every visit.

Work Out Which Route Fits

Four repairs of the same fault with the fault still there, under section 42-179(e)(1)(A). Or thirty or more cumulative calendar days out of service, under section 42-179(e)(1)(B). Or, for a fault likely to cause death or serious bodily injury, two repairs under section 42-179(f), inside the express warranty term or one year from delivery, whichever ended first. Under every route, section 42-179(e)(3) needs at least one repair attempt, or a refusal to make one.

Establish the Forum, Then File

Section 42-181(b) opens the Department's arbitration only where your manufacturer has no Attorney General certification for its own program, and Connecticut publishes no list. Then the request goes in on the Department's form with the $50 fee, and the manufacturer has fifteen days to return its form with $250. The Department screens for eligibility, and a rejection can go to an arbitrator for a final decision. The statute and the regulations set no deadline for the request itself.

The Decision, Then Thirty Days

The Department gathers the evidence, subpoenas what it needs, and sends everything to an ASE-certified technical expert who advises the arbitrator. The decision is due within sixty days and turns solely on whether the manufacturer complied with section 42-179. The arbitrator can order a replacement, the full contract price with collateral charges, reimbursement and incidental damages, but not a repair. A manufacturer that doesn't perform faces fines up to $1,000 a day. To challenge the award, section 52-420(b) gives thirty days from notice of it.

Each of those stages is a place a Connecticut claim can come apart. Four invoices that describe one fault four ways. A thirty-day count built on business days. A safety-fault claim brought at fourteen months, when section 42-179(f) closed that route at twelve. A month in a manufacturer program that never held a certification. A thirty-day window to challenge an award that nobody noticed, because the deadline lives in a different chapter.

You can run this yourself, and some Connecticut drivers do. The first question, which forum you're in, depends on a certificate the state doesn't publish. Nobody can tell you in advance how an arbitrator will decide. What a firm that handles these claims can do is establish the forum, pick the right route, and keep the mileage from wearing down the award.

Outcomes

What compensation can you receive?

What the refund includes

When a Connecticut claim succeeds, section 42-179(d)(1) makes the manufacturer either replace the vehicle with “a new motor vehicle acceptable to the consumer” or take it back and refund an itemized list:

  • the full contract price, including charges for undercoating, dealer preparation, transportation and installed options;
  • all collateral charges, including sales tax, license and registration fees and similar government charges;
  • all finance charges you incurred after you first reported the fault, and during any later period the vehicle was out of service;
  • all incidental damages, which section 42-179(d)(2) defines to include inspection, transportation, care and custody of the vehicle, and reasonable efforts to avoid the consequences of financial default.

On sales tax, Connecticut has two rates. The Department of Revenue Services sets the general rate at 6.35%, but a vehicle priced over $50,000 is taxed at 7.75%. Since sales tax comes back as a collateral charge, the refund on a vehicle above that line includes tax at the higher rate.

The deduction keeps counting until the car goes back

Section 42-179(d)(3) sets the use allowance with a denominator of 120,000 and a numerator of “the number of miles that the vehicle traveled prior to the manufacturer's acceptance of its return.”

  1. Take the miles on the vehicle on the day the manufacturer accepts its return, not the miles at your first report.
  2. Multiply them by the total contract price.
  3. Divide by 120,000. That's the deduction.

In round numbers: on a $48,000 vehicle returned at 20,000 miles, the allowance is $48,000 × 20,000 ÷ 120,000 = $8,000. Drive it another 6,000 miles before the manufacturer accepts the return and it becomes $48,000 × 26,000 ÷ 120,000 = $10,400. That's $2,400 lost to time alone, which is the plainest reason to start early. Refunds go “to the consumer, lessor and lienholder if any, as their interests may appear”, and naming the lessor matters on a lease.

Fees are up to the court

Section 42-180 says the court “in its discretion, may award to the plaintiff his costs and reasonable attorney's fees”, and may award them to the defendant where the action “was brought without any substantial justification.” The parallel route section 42-184 opens under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act is discretionary too: section 42-110g(d) says the court “may award” fees based on the work reasonably performed, “and not on the amount of recovery.” Section 42-181(e) adds costs and fees where a manufacturer appealed an award without good cause, also at the court's discretion. Where a claim runs on federal warranty law, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act has its own fee provision under 15 U.S.C. section 2310.

Possible Outcomes

Five things a successful Connecticut claim can bring

  • The full contract price

    Including undercoating, dealer preparation, transportation and installed options, as section 42-179(d)(1) itemizes them

  • Or a new vehicle you accept

    A replacement acceptable to you, with any lessor and lienholder paid as their interests appear

  • Sales tax and registration back

    Collateral charges, with sales tax at the rate you paid, which is 7.75% above $50,000

  • Finance charges and incidentals

    Finance charges from your first report onward, plus inspection, transport, care and custody costs

  • Costs and fees, if the court awards them

    Section 42-180 leaves that to the court's discretion, in either direction

Outcomes depend on the facts of each case, so no attorney can tell you in advance what yours will be.

Manufacturers We've Taken to Court

We Take On the
Biggest Names

Vehicles We Handle

Which vehicles does the Connecticut lemon law cover?

Section 42-179 has no exclusion list: nothing carved out for motor homes, off-road vehicles or business use. Instead section 42-179(a)(2) reaches three named classes as section 14-1 defines them, and anything outside those three is outside the chapter. Coverage is a question of definitions, and the only size test is a ten-passenger capacity. Pick a category to see where it stands.

Cars, Vans and Light Trucks

Covered as “passenger motor vehicles”, which section 14-1(74) defines as built to carry occupants “with a capacity of carrying not more than ten passengers including the operator.” No weight limit. Leases are in, and section 42-179(a)(1) extends “consumer” to anyone the vehicle is transferred to during the express warranty, so a second owner inside the factory warranty has rights too. See our practice areas.

Heavy and Dual-Use Pickups

Covered through a second class most people never notice. Section 42-179(a)(2) reaches “passenger and commercial motor vehicles”, which section 14-1(73) defines as a vehicle “used for private passenger and commercial purposes which is eligible for combination registration.” A pickup that works both ways is inside the chapter by name, with no business-use exclusion and no weight ceiling. Derate and emissions issues are the most common patterns we encounter, and they can also support a diesel emissions claim.

Motorcycles and Autocycles

Covered by name since Public Act 97-6 added “or a motorcycle, as defined in section 14-1.” Section 14-1(61) folds in an autocycle, a three-wheeler with a steering wheel and seats you don't straddle, and folds out a small motor-driven cycle under fifty cubic centimeters. A motorcycle claim runs on the same two-year, 24,000-mile clock as a car. A 1996 decision that held otherwise is no longer the answer, because the 1997 amendment named motorcycles as a separate class. See our motorcycle lemon law page.

RVs and Motorhomes

Outside the chapter, by definition rather than by exclusion. Section 42-179 carves nothing out. It reaches three section 14-1 classes, and a “motor home” and a “camper” are separate classes that section 42-179(a)(2) never lists. A Connecticut motor home is out because it isn't one of the three. Our RV and motorhome page covers the federal route, which has no vehicle-type exclusions.

Electric Vehicles

Covered on the same terms as any other new vehicle. Battery, charging, drive-unit and software faults are the patterns we see most, and the standard in section 42-179(d)(1) suits them: a fault that substantially impairs use, safety or value to the consumer. A software fault that keeps coming back fits section 42-179(e)(1)(A)'s “the same nonconformity ... but such nonconformity continues to exist.” Our electric vehicle lemon law page goes further.

See All Practice Areas →
Client Stories

What Our Clients Say

Real results from real clients who trusted
RockPoint Law with their lemon law claims.

I contacted RockPoint Law in July 2025 and by mid Jan 2026, I had received my settlement proceeds. A mid 5-figure loan was paid off and the manufacturer took possession of the vehicle. Not having that car payment and the mandatory full coverage freed up about $900/month. If you're on the fence about calling RockPoint Law, let it go. The relief you will feel when it all works out will be soooo worth it.

Read more
HJ
Henry Jose
Google Review

Was having nothing but issues with the DEF system in my Ram 3500. I didn't have high hopes because 3500 trucks are generally excluded from lemon law. The entire process from the time I contacted RockPoint Law to the time I received my settlement was under 6 months! Their response times were well above expectations.

Read more
JR
Joe Russo
Google Review

My Telluride's transmission would jerk so hard between gears that my coffee would spill. Dealer had it four times. When I called RockPoint Law, they asked the exact technical question I'd been researching for weeks. We got a buyback with reimbursement for my deductible and rental costs. They speak fluent mechanic before they speak lawyer.

Read more
K
Kirill
Google Review

Turbo failure on my EcoBoost F-150. Dealer replaced it once, then denied the second. Steven Nassi compared my case to known manufacturing defects for that engine. Other lawyers just saw 'engine trouble.' Steven built the argument around the known defect pattern. Secured a full refund.

Read more
JR
Joshua Ragsdale
Google Review

Our minivan's sliding door would just stop working. Not a great feature with little kids. Tried to get it fixed under warranty three times. Final straw was when it almost closed on my son's arm. Leo was our attorney and got us a great outcome. They handled everything from start to finish.

Read more
JG
Jorge Garcia
Google Review

My family's cross-country road trip turned into a nightmare when our brand-new SUV broke down in three different states. Each dealership kept giving us the run-around. RockPoint Law tracked every failed repair, hotel receipt, and even our unused theme park tickets. They got us a full buyback plus $8,200 for the vacation that fell apart.

Read more
AG
Adam Gore
Google Review

The active suspension in my Ram 1500 started making a loud 'clunk' on every bump. Dealer replaced one part but the noise just moved to another corner. After the third repair, I was done. Natalie Nassi said, 'A repeated failure of a major chassis component is a clear impairment to value and use.' She didn't see a noise; she saw a failed system.

Read more
PM
Piyawan Maprakhon
Google Review

My car is basically my mobile office. When the electrical system fried two laptops and killed my productivity, I reached out to RockPoint Law. Unlike the dealer who treated me as a nuisance, RockPoint Law saw how it impacted my ability to work. They secured a full refund on the vehicle plus $6,500 for lost income and equipment.

Read more
SK
Sadie Kim
Google Review

The manufacturer told me I was out of luck. RockPoint Law told me otherwise — and proved it! Their lemon law experience turned my nightmare into a fair resolution. What impressed me most was their transparency — no false claims, just hard facts and harder work. Worth every penny and then some!

Read more
KE
Kevin Eimuth
Google Review

From the moment I walked into their office shaking with frustration, the team at RockPoint Law put me at ease. They listened patiently to my whole story, then laid out a clear game plan. Six weeks later, I was holding a check that made all those repair shop trips worth it. True professionals who deliver!

Read more
JB
Jatt James Bond
Google Review

We had two vans with the same transmission failure. RockPoint Law consolidated both claims, lined up build dates, and pushed for an extended coverage fix. Both vans were repaired, and we got downtime reimbursed.

Read more
KS
Kishan Singh
Google Review

The hands-free liftgate on my SUV would randomly open in my garage, denting the door. I felt crazy complaining about a 'convenience feature.' Our attorney reframed it: 'An uncontrolled operation of a motorized component is a safety and property damage risk.' The team used my security camera footage as evidence. We got a solid settlement.

Read more
PS
Peyman Soleimani
Google Review
Used Cars

Is there a lemon law for used cars in Connecticut?

Not chapter 743b, which is a new-vehicle statute. Connecticut has a separate used-vehicle law in chapter 743f, and it works differently. It puts a warranty on the dealer, tiered by the price of the car rather than its mileage, and covers the full cost of parts and labor.

Minimum dealer warranty on a used car in Connecticut, whichever limit comes first
Cash price of the carWarranty must cover
Under $3,000No statutory warranty; may be sold “as is”
$3,000 to under $5,00030 days or 1,500 miles
$5,000 and above60 days or 3,000 miles

A dealer selling at $3,000 or more can't disclaim implied warranties, and can't water the warranty down with phrases like “fifty-fifty” or “drive train only.” The law doesn't apply below $3,000, to sales between dealers, or to a vehicle seven or more model years old. “As is” sales are allowed only in those cases, in a boxed notice in twelve-point boldface that you sign inside the box.

A used car can still fall under the new-car statute. Section 42-179(a)(1) treats anyone the vehicle is transferred to during the express warranty as a consumer, so a lightly used car still inside two years and 24,000 miles from its original delivery may carry the full new-car remedy. Tell us both dates, the original delivery and your purchase.

Start My Free Case Review 

Why RockPoint

Why Connecticut drivers choose RockPoint Law

Lemon law and consumer warranty work is our core practice, and we act for drivers across Connecticut. In this state a claim is filed with a state department and not in a local courthouse, so where you live doesn't decide whether it's worth bringing, and a driver in Hartford and a driver a long way out of Hartford start from the same place with us.

Lemon Law Is Our Core Practice

It isn't a side practice here, and it isn't something we fit in when other work is slow. Warranty and lemon law is what we do every day, for drivers who ended up stuck with a defective vehicle and want to know what to do about it.

All 169 Towns, Not Just the Gold Coast

Connecticut's counties stopped governing in 1960, and since then the town has been the unit that matters, and that's the level local life here gets organized around. The claim goes to a state department either way, so we take cases from Greenwich over to Putnam, and not only the ones that come from the Fairfield County commuter belt.

We Establish the Forum First

Four repairs, thirty calendar days, or two repairs on a safety fault inside one year are the ways in, and under all three is the question of whether your manufacturer holds an Attorney General certification, which decides whether you are even in the state program at all. Connecticut doesn't publish that list anywhere you can look it up, so we work it out first and then everything else gets built on the answer.

Clear Communication

We give you straight updates at every stage of your case, so there aren't long silences where you're stuck guessing, and there aren't surprises.

No Upfront Legal Fees

Qualifying cases run on contingency, so you don't pay a fee unless we recover for you. Connecticut leaves any award of fees against the manufacturer to the court under section 42-180, and we explain what that means for your case at the start.

Meet the Team →
Our Story

Meet the Firm Behind Your Claim

The same attorneys who handle claims nationwide handle them here. Two minutes on who we are and how we work.

Side-by-Side

Do I need a lemon law attorney in Connecticut?

Handling a Connecticut claim alone vs with an attorney. Flip the switch to see the same four moments from both sides.

Vehicle repair invoices spread across a kitchen table with a hand hovering over them
On your own1 / 4

Bringing a safety claim at fourteen months on two repairs

Section 42-179(f) gives you two repairs and confines that route to the warranty term or one year from delivery, whichever ended first. Reading only the first half of that sentence is the Connecticut mistake we see most.

A person on the phone at a home desk with a notepad of call notes
On your own2 / 4

Taking the manufacturer's word that its program comes first

Section 42-181(b) opens the state arbitration where the manufacturer has no Attorney General certification, and Connecticut publishes no list. A letter insisting on the manufacturer's panel doesn't prove the panel was ever certified.

A wall calendar with deadline dates circled in red beside a set of car keys
On your own3 / 4

Driving on while the dispute runs

Section 42-179(d)(3) counts miles up to the manufacturer's acceptance of the return, not to your first report. Every month of delay costs real money off the refund.

One person alone at the end of a long empty hearing room table
On your own4 / 4

Treating the award as the end of it

The award can be reviewed in the Superior Court, de novo on law and for substantial evidence on fact, and section 52-420(b) allows only thirty days from notice to move to vacate, modify or correct. That deadline sits in a different chapter, which is why it gets missed.

Hands working through an organized stack of repair orders with a highlighter and index tabs
With RockPoint Law1 / 4

The right route, and the day each one closes

We check which of section 42-179's routes your record clears and date each one: two years and 24,000 miles for four repairs or thirty days, the warranty term or one year for the safety route.

A certified mail envelope and return receipt card being prepared on a desk
With RockPoint Law2 / 4

The forum established, not assumed

We find out whether an Attorney General certification exists. If a non-conforming manufacturer panel already ruled against you, section 42-181(h) allows a fresh hearing before a state arbitrator, with that panel's findings admissible.

An open case planner with color-coded deadline tabs being marked
With RockPoint Law3 / 4

The offset worked out at the start

Because the count runs to the return, we do the 120,000-mile sum at the outset, so decisions about how to proceed rest on the real number rather than last month's mileage.

A bound exhibit folder open on a conference table
With RockPoint Law4 / 4

Every clock tracked, including the one in chapter 909

Fifteen days for the manufacturer's answer, sixty days for the decision, and thirty days under section 52-420(b) to challenge an award. We keep all of them.

Serving All 169 Towns

On the ground across Connecticut

3.6 million people, 169 towns, no county governments

Connecticut counted 3,605,944 residents in the 2020 census on 4,842 square miles, about 745 people per square mile, on the Census Bureau's figures. It governs itself through 169 towns. County government was abolished in 1960, and the Connecticut State Library says that since then “the names and boundaries of its eight counties have existed only as geographical names.” In 2022 the Census Bureau formally replaced those eight counties with nine planning regions as the state's county equivalents. When a Connecticut driver names a county, it's a location, not a government.

Short trips, a lot of them

21,478 miles of public road carry more than 2.8 million registered vehicles and 2.6 million licensed drivers, in the Federal Highway Administration's Highway Statistics 2023, on the corridor between New York and Boston. The Gold Star Memorial Bridge carries I-95 and US-1 over the Thames between New London and Groton. The Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge at New Haven opened fully in 2015. The Merritt Parkway, on the National Register of Historic Places since April 1991, bars commercial vehicles: no trucks, no buses, nothing over eight thousand pounds or eight feet tall.

From Pope-Hartford to no assembly lines at all

The Pope Manufacturing Company had electric automobiles on the road in Hartford in 1897, and in Bridgeport the Locomobile Company built steam cars from 1899, then luxury cars. Today Connecticut builds no cars. It builds jet engines at East Hartford, helicopters at Stratford and submarines at Groton, with automotive suppliers such as Stanadyne at Windsor and Amphenol at Wallingford.

No yearly safety inspection, so the paper trail is yours

Connecticut does not require a periodic safety inspection of ordinary cars and trucks; its DMV says so. Emissions testing exists, with vehicles under four model years old exempt and a $20 fee, but there's no yearly state record of your vehicle's condition. Three rights fill that gap: section 42-179a's copies of repair paperwork on request, section 42-181(d)'s Department-gathered evidence and subpoenas, and section 42-227's duty on a manufacturer to disclose any warranty adjustment program and reimburse owners who already paid for a covered repair.

Who Connecticut employs

Universities, hospitals, insurers and the aerospace plants: Yale in New Haven, Hartford HealthCare, The Hartford and Cigna at Hartford and Bloomfield, Stanley Black & Decker at New Britain, Synchrony at Stamford, Booking Holdings and EMCOR at Norwalk, Barnes Group at Bristol, Pratt & Whitney at East Hartford, Sikorsky at Stratford, Electric Boat at Groton, and the two tribal resorts, Foxwoods at Mashantucket and Mohegan Sun at Uncasville. The commute is usually what exposes the defect.

We take Connecticut lemon law claims from across the state, including:

  • Bridgeport
  • Stamford
  • New Haven
  • Hartford
  • Waterbury
  • Norwalk
  • Danbury
  • New Britain
  • West Hartford
  • Greenwich
  • Fairfield
  • Meriden

Three of those twelve, West Hartford, Greenwich and Fairfield, are towns rather than cities. In Connecticut that carries no hierarchy: a city is a town that adopted a city charter, and both have the same authority.

How to reach us

RockPoint Law doesn't keep an office in Connecticut, and a Connecticut claim doesn't need one. The request goes to the Department of Consumer Protection, which screens it, gathers the evidence and appoints the arbitrator, and by written agreement a case can be decided on the documents. The quickest way to start is the online intake form. We review every request and respond as soon as we can. Or call (516) 550-3323.

Our New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania guides cover those states' own rules.

Connecticut city pages

Case Results

Recent RockPoint Law recoveries

These figures come from our firm's published lemon law settlement record across brands. They're firmwide results, not Connecticut outcomes, and they show what a well-documented defect claim can be worth when it's handled properly.

$160,264 BMW X6

Recovery on a vehicle with engine, electrical and suspension defects.

$144,550 Porsche Macan

Recovery on a Macan with suspension, drivetrain, electrical and HVAC problems.

$110,289 Rivian R1T

Recovery after electrical, engine and suspension failures on an electric pickup.

Figures are drawn from our firm's published settlement record and are not specific to Connecticut matters. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. See more RockPoint Law settlements 

RockPoint Law, by the numbers

$50M+**
Recovered for clients
3,000+‡
Cases handled
25+
Years of combined experience
97%*
Resolution rate
  • Free Consultation
  • No attorney's fees unless we recover for you.†
Recent Google reviewsAcross all RockPoint offices: 4.8 from 19 Google reviews
  • ★★★★★a month ago
    I had a really good experience with RockPoint Law. The whole process was a lot easier than I expected and everyone I dealt with was helpful and responsive. Whenever I had a question, I was able to get an answer without feeling like I was chasing anyone down. They handled everything and kept me updated along the way. Definitely glad I reached out to them.
    Ronen S. Malekmehr
  • ★★★★★6 months ago
    Saw RockPoint Law and wasn't sure. Called anyway because I was at my wit's end. Natalie Nassi answered and she remembered me from somewhere else. Same calm voice, same no-nonsense approach. She took my case and handled everything. Manufacturer bought the car back. Name on the door changed but Natalie didn't. That's what matters to me.
    Tanja Moldenhauer
  • ★★★★★6 months ago
    Saw RockPoint Law online and wasn't sure because I hadn't heard of them. But I was desperate. My car had been in and out of the shop for months. Called them up and the person I spoke with was so easy to talk to. No legal mumbo jumbo, just straight talk. They took my case and got me a buyback. New name but they know what they're doing. Would recommend.
    Rodolfo Paulino
2 more Google reviews
  • ★★★★★6 months ago
    Honestly wasn't sure about RockPoint Law since I hadn't heard of them before. But I was desperate. My car had been in the shop five times for the same problem and nobody could figure it out. Service advisor started avoiding my calls. I found RockPoint online, called, and the person I talked to was really down to earth. They took my repair orders and handled the whole thing. A few months later, the manufacturer bought the car back. New name but they got it done. Would use them again in a heartbeat.
    Om Shiv
  • ★★★★★6 months ago
    Saw RockPoint Law pop up when I was googling lemon law help. Wasn't sure about the name but figured I'd give it a shot. My Jeep Gladiator had a death wobble at highway speeds—front end would shake violently. Dealer replaced the steering stabilizer twice, still shook. The person I talked to at RockPoint was super calm and explained everything clearly. They handled the claim and Jeep bought the truck back. Glad I didn't let the new name scare me off. They got the job done.
    Víctor Torres

About this page

Written and edited by the RockPoint Law content team. Prepared September 2026 to reflect the Connecticut New Automobile Warranties statute, Conn. Gen. Stat. sections 42-179 through 42-190, arbitrated by the Department of Consumer Protection. See our editorial policy.

Anyone can check a Connecticut attorney's license status and public discipline record through the Connecticut Judicial Branch's attorney and law firm look-up, which is the regulator's own record rather than a bio page. We think you should, for any firm you're considering, including this one.

Start here

Tell us what the car is doing in Connecticut

Three details about the vehicle, and how to reach you.

  • The year and make of your vehicle
  • What the dealer has already tried, and whether you paid for it
  • Your name, phone and email. We review every request and respond as soon as we can

No cost, no obligation. Contacting RockPoint Law does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Check my case Start My Free Case Review Or call (516) 550-3323
Our Team

Meet the Team
Behind RockPoint Law

A dedicated team that stands with you through every step of your Lemon Law claim.

Steven Nassi
Steven Nassi
Managing Partner
Founder · 25+ years of litigation experience
★ Founder & Managing Partner
Natalie Nassi
Natalie Nassi
Managing Partner
Columbia University · 20+ years in consumer advocacy
Ron Kaniuk
Ron Kaniuk
Florida Managing Partner
St. John's University School of Law · Consumer protection & lemon law
Aaron Waldo
Aaron Waldo
Attorney
U.S. Marine Corps veteran · Automotive background
Liam Jones
Liam Jones
Attorney
Licensed in New York & New Jersey
Christian Garcia
Christian Garcia
Senior Case Manager
Case management from intake through resolution
Rudy Gutierrez
Rudy Gutierrez
Intake Manager
First point of contact for new clients & case evaluations

Case results in Connecticut

Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. All case results

FAQ

Connecticut lemon law questions

What Connecticut drivers ask us before they file with the Department of Consumer Protection, answered from the statute.

Does Connecticut have a lemon law?

Yes. Chapter 743b of the General Statutes, sections 42-179 to 42-190, has provided coverage for new vehicles since 1982, and the state arbitration program applies to vehicles purchased on or after 1 October 1984.

Yes, and it was the first state to pass one. Public Act 82-287 created it in 1982, and the Department of Consumer Protection's 2025 annual report describes Connecticut as the first state to establish an automobile dispute program in that year. The statute is chapter 743b of the General Statutes, sections 42-179 to 42-190. The state-run arbitration program came two years later, under Public Act 84-338, and applies to vehicles bought on or after 1 October 1984. Section 42-179 makes the manufacturer repair a fault you report inside two years or 24,000 miles, and replace or refund the vehicle once it has had a reasonable number of attempts. Section 42-181 then puts the claim before an arbitrator the Department appoints.

What qualifies for the lemon law in Connecticut?

A fault that substantially impairs use, safety or value to you, still there after four repairs or thirty calendar days out of service inside two years or 24,000 miles. A safety fault qualifies after two repairs inside one year or the warranty term. At least one repair attempt, or a refusal, is required on every route.

A vehicle qualifies when a defect substantially impairs its use, safety or value to the consumer and survives a reasonable number of attempts. Connecticut gives three routes. Section 42-179(e)(1) covers the same fault repaired four or more times with the fault still existing, or thirty or more cumulative calendar days out of service, both inside two years or 24,000 miles. Section 42-179(f) adds a third: two repairs where the fault is likely to cause death or serious bodily injury, but only inside the warranty term or one year from delivery. Underneath all three, section 42-179(e)(3) bars any claim unless at least one repair attempt was made, or the manufacturer or dealer refused one.

How many repair attempts does Connecticut require?

Four repairs of the same fault on the two-year, 24,000-mile clock. A fault likely to cause death or serious bodily injury needs two, but only inside the warranty term or one year from delivery, whichever ends first.

Four of the same fault under section 42-179(e)(1)(A), with the fault still existing, on the two-year or 24,000-mile clock. But Connecticut also has a safety route that almost every summary reports only half of. Section 42-179(f) presumes a reasonable number of attempts after just two repairs where the fault results in a condition likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle is driven. The catch is in the same sentence: that route is confined to the express warranty term or one year following original delivery, whichever ends first. So the safety route gives you fewer repairs and less time than the ordinary one. Which route fits depends on what the fault is and when it was written up.

What is the Connecticut lemon law time frame?

Report the fault within two years of delivery or 24,000 miles, whichever ends first; the safety route uses one year or the warranty term. There's no deadline to request arbitration, but you have thirty days from notice of an award to challenge it.

Section 42-179(b) gives you two years following original delivery or the first 24,000 miles of operation, whichever ends first, to report the fault. The same subsection obliges the manufacturer to repair notwithstanding that the work happens after the period expires, but for the presumptions in section 42-179(e), the repairs or days out of service must also fall inside that period. The safety route at section 42-179(f) runs on a shorter clock, the warranty term or one year, whichever ends first. After that, something in your favor: section 42-181 sets no deadline at all for requesting arbitration, and neither do the regulations. The tight clock comes at the other end. Once an award is made, section 52-420(b) allows thirty days from notice of it to move to vacate, modify or correct.

Do I have to write to the manufacturer before I file in Connecticut?

Only if your warranty or owner's manual clearly says written notice is required. If it does, the manufacturer has to give you the address to send it to.

Only if the manufacturer told you to, in writing, in advance. Section 42-179(c) says no consumer shall be required to notify the manufacturer of a claim unless the manufacturer has clearly and conspicuously disclosed, in the warranty or the owner's manual, that written notification of the fault is required before you can be eligible for a refund or replacement. And if it does impose that requirement, the same subsection makes it give you the name and address to send the notice to. So the answer is in your own glovebox.

Where is a Connecticut lemon law case actually heard?

Before an arbitrator the Commissioner of Consumer Protection appoints. The Department gathers the evidence, an ASE-certified expert advises the arbitrator, and the decision is due within sixty days.

Before an arbitrator appointed by the Commissioner of Consumer Protection, under section 42-181(a), who must belong to an arbitration organization and must have no connection to any vehicle manufacturer, distributor, dealer or repairer. The Department does more than schedule it. Section 42-181(d) makes it investigate, gather and organize all the information, lets the Commissioner issue subpoenas on the arbitrator's behalf, and requires every piece of written evidence to go to an independent technical expert certified by the National Institute of Automotive Service Excellence, who advises the arbitrator. The decision is due within sixty days. One limit is worth knowing: the arbitrator may order replacement, refund, reimbursement and damages, but section 42-181(d) excludes repair of the vehicle by name.

Do I have to go through the manufacturer's arbitration first in Connecticut?

Only if the Attorney General has certified the manufacturer's own procedure. Connecticut doesn't publish a list, so the answer has to be established for your manufacturer.

It depends on a certificate, and Connecticut does not publish the list. Section 42-181(b) opens the Department's arbitration to you only if your manufacturer has not established an informal dispute settlement procedure certified by the Attorney General. If it has one, section 42-179(j) closes the refund-and-replacement provisions until you have used it. Section 42-182 gives the Attorney General the certifying job, with an annual report, subpoena power, public hearings and the power to suspend or revoke. Because there is no published list, this gets established rather than looked up. There is a second chance if the manufacturer's panel was run badly: section 42-181(h) allows arbitration de novo before a state arbitrator where a procedure does not conform to the federal rules.

Does the Connecticut lemon law cover a used car?

Not under chapter 743b. Chapter 743f gives most used cars sold by a dealer for $3,000 or more a warranty of 30 days or 1,500 miles, or 60 days or 3,000 miles at $5,000 and above.

Not chapter 743b, but Connecticut has a separate used-vehicle statute. Chapter 743f tiers the dealer's warranty by price rather than mileage: 30 days or 1,500 miles between $3,000 and $5,000, and 60 days or 3,000 miles at $5,000 and above, covering the full cost of parts and labor. A dealer selling at $3,000 or more may not disclaim implied warranties at all, and may not dilute the warranty with phrases like fifty-fifty or drive train only. It does not apply below $3,000, between dealers, or to a vehicle seven model years or older. As is sales are allowed only in those last two cases, in a boxed twelve-point notice you sign inside the box.

Does it cover motorcycles, RVs, or heavy pickups?

Motorcycles and autocycles yes, dual-use pickups yes, motorhomes and campers no. The statute covers three vehicle classes defined in section 14-1, with no weight limit.

Motorcycles yes, heavy pickups yes, motorhomes no. Section 42-179(a)(2) reaches three classes as section 14-1 defines them: a passenger motor vehicle, a passenger and commercial motor vehicle, or a motorcycle. Motorcycles went in by Public Act 97-6, and the definition folds in an autocycle while folding out a small motor-driven cycle. A dual-use pickup is covered as a passenger and commercial motor vehicle, and there is no weight limit and no business-use exclusion. Motorhomes and campers are separate section 14-1 classes that section 42-179 never lists, so they are outside the chapter by definition rather than by an exclusion clause. Where the chapter does not reach, the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act has no vehicle-type exclusions at all.

How is a Connecticut buyback calculated?

The full contract price with collateral charges, finance charges after your first report, and incidental damages, less contract price times miles at the manufacturer's acceptance of the return, divided by 120,000.

Section 42-179(d)(1) refunds the full contract price including undercoating, dealer preparation, transportation and installed options, plus all collateral charges including sales tax and registration fees, plus finance charges incurred after your first report, plus incidental damages. Then the deduction. Section 42-179(d)(3) multiplies the total contract price by a fraction with a denominator of 120,000 and a numerator of the miles the vehicle traveled prior to the manufacturer's acceptance of its return. That count does not stop at your first report, so every mile driven while the dispute runs reduces the award. Note too that a vehicle priced over $50,000 carries Connecticut sales tax at 7.75% rather than 6.35%.

Who pays my attorney's fees in a Connecticut lemon law case?

The court decides. Section 42-180 lets it award fees to the plaintiff, or to the defendant for a claim brought without substantial justification.

That is the court's decision, and it can go either way. Section 42-180 says the court, in its discretion, may award the plaintiff costs and reasonable attorney's fees, or, if it determines the action was brought without any substantial justification, may award costs and fees to the defendant. The parallel route that section 42-184 creates under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act is discretionary too: section 42-110g(d) says the court may award fees, calculated on the work reasonably performed rather than on the amount recovered. Section 42-181(e) adds one narrower provision, allowing the court to grant a consumer costs and fees where a manufacturer appealed an award without good cause. Each of the three says may.

What does a Connecticut lemon law attorney cost, and what should I bring?

Qualifying cases run on contingency, with no fee unless we recover for you. Bring your repair invoices with dates, the purchase or lease agreement, your current mileage and your owner's manual.

We handle qualifying lemon law cases on contingency, so there is no upfront fee and no fee unless we recover for you. Connecticut leaves any award of fees against the manufacturer to the court's discretion under section 42-180, and we explain what that means for your case at the start. For the first conversation, bring every repair invoice with the drop-off and collection dates, the purchase or lease agreement, your current odometer reading, and your owner's manual. That last one matters here, because section 42-179(c) makes written notice a requirement only where the manual says so. If a dealer has not given you the invoices, bring what you have: section 42-179a entitles you to copies on request, so that gap can be closed.

Don't take on the manufacturer alone.

Tell us the vehicle and what the dealer has already tried. No fee unless we recover for you.†

Start My Free Case Review  Call (516) 550-3323
Call Now Free Case Review →
Free & Confidential — No attorney’s fees unless we recover for you.